Country,Region,Reference # for EA,Project,Date,Ecosystem,Project/Sector,Linear Disturbance? (Y/N),Financial or development aid project?,"Passive participation (1,0)","Participation in information giving (1,0)","Participation by consultation (1,0)","Functional participation (1,0)","Interactive Participation (1,0)","Self-mobilization (1,0)","Stakeholder - Political (1,0)","Stakeholder - Cultural (1,0)","Stakeholder - Business (1,0)","Stakeholder - Environment (1,0)","Stakeholder - Aboriginal (1,0)","Stakeholder - Local non-Aboriginal (1,0)",Type of Assessment,# Identified general VECs,# Identified specific VECs,Types of VECs considered,# Provisioning Services Identified,# Supporting Services Identified,# Regulating Services Identified,# Cultural Services Identified,Track VEC space individually?,Project Footprint (km2),Directly Affected Area (km2) - local study area (biotic),Social and Economic Directly Affected area (Km2)- Local study area,Indirectly Affected Area (km2) - regional study area (biotic),Social and Economic Indirectly Affected area (Km2)-Regional study area,Ratio - regional/local study area,operational cycle (years),Construction cycle (years),full cycle (years),Ratio - temporal cumulative effects,# pages cumulative impacts,# pages project specific impacts,Ratio - Cumulative effect attention in impact consideration,# pages full report,Ratio - Importance of impacts (direct + indirect),# Stressors identified,# negative impacts identified,# of positive impacts identified,# total of impacts identified,# total of negative impacts characterized,# residual impacts,# Significant impacts Identified,# Significant impacts characterized,# Cumulative impacts,# Significant Cumulative impacts,Considerations for significance of impacts,Considerations for significance of cumulative impacts,Ratio - impacts to VECs,Ratio - significant impacts,Ratio - significant cumulative impacts,# Mitigation measures - avoidance,# Mitigation measures - minimize,# Mitigation measures - remediation/restoration,# Mitigation measures - offset,# Mitigation measures - other (to be used with caution),Ratio - avoidance for impacts,Ratio - minimize for impacts,Ratio - remediation for impacts,Ratio - offset for impacts,Total # Mitigation measures identified,Total # Mitigation measures characterized,# Mitigation measures with weasel terms,Ratio - unenforceable mitigation criteria,Approval status,Link to EA,Observations,Observations,# of environmental VECs evaluated using standards,# of environmental VECs,# of economic VECs evaluated using standards,# of economic VECs,# of social and human health VECs evaluated using standards,# of social and human health VECs,Total # of VECs evaluated using standards,Total # of VECs,Proportion of VECs with guidelines to determine signficance,# of VECs with parameters that exceed Canadian Guidelines for baseline conditions,# of times Canadian Guidelines are exceeded but effects deemed insignficant ,Proportion of VECs with baseline values over guidelines,Proportion of VECs with predicted impacts over guidelines,"baseline conditions already exceeded used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)","literature review used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)","professional judgment used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)","other jurisdictional standards used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)","model uncertainty used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)","scale of impact used as rationale for exceedance (1,0)",Types of Cumulative Effects,,Significance framework,,
British Columbia,Southern BC,,narrows Inlet Hydro Project,21/08/2012,Multiple,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),55,3,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,3,13,2,9,Yes,8.5,122.6,1766.5,400,5232,3.261578604,40,6,46,1.15,25,2013,0.01,3375,0.007,186,798,75,1247,798,780,24,24,21,5,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,13.75862069,0.03,0.01,107,341,66,7,0,0.13,0.43,0.08,0.01,521,521,21,0.040307102,Approved,NOT GIVENrrows Inlet Hydro Project,,,3,37,0,5,0,16,3,58,0.051724138,2,2,0.666666667,0.666666667,1,1,1,0,1,1,not outlined,,Not Given,"a. Direction, magnitude, geographic extent, and frequency are the principal criteria used to assess significance","Residual effects that are expected to result in a threat to the
sustainability of fish habitat and may result in adverse effects to levels of
fish populations (as opposed to light to moderate change)"
British Columbia,Southwest BC,-,Harrison Lake 3 Projects,4/1/2012,Multiple,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),27,22,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,2,0,0,3,Yes,0.9,73,5750,1780,11900,24.38356164,40,4,47,1.175,114,770,0.15,1101,0.104,,320,31,351,320,216,0,0,144,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,6.530612245,0,0,109,456,132,17,0,0.34,1.43,0.41,0.05,714,714,105,0.147058824,Approved,"Tretheway Creek Waterpower Project, ",Shovel Creek + Big Silver Waterpower Project,,1,33,0,6,0,10,1,49,0.020408163,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,not outlined,,Not Given,"list of factors that go in. The significance of the residual environmental effects of the Project is evaluated on the basis of a
review of relevant literature, data collected through field studies, consultation with experts, and
professional judgement of the study team",
British Columbia,Northeast BC ,-,Meikle Wind Energy Project,20/11/2013,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),25,6,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,0,0,0,0,Yes,2.6,29.7,29.7,19700,119110,663.2996633,25,3,29,1.16,66,495,0.13,948,0.07,19,520,21,541,520,28,0,0,17,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,16.77419355,0,0,76,541,106,0,0,0.15,1.04,0.2,0,723,723,101,0.139695712,Approved,Meikle Wind Energy Project,,,5,18,0,1,3,12,8,31,0.258064516,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,not outlined,,Not Given,"list of criteria. Where standards are not available, professional judgement is used based on scientific
literature through a transparent step-wise process that considers the characteristics of the effect in the
overall determination of significance",
British Columbia,Northwest BC,-,Kitsault Mine Project,2/5/2012,Multiple,Mining,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),62,13,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,13,9,0,19,Yes,3.2,42,903,593,12407,14.11904762,16,2,40,2.19375,175,2181,0.08,3872,0.045,71,151,40,756,14,270,0,0,48,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,2.013333333,0,0,16,284,61,3,0,0.11,1.88,0.4,0.02,364,473,6,0.016483516,Approved,Kitsault Mine Project,"There are A LOT of discrepancies in this EA for impacts, residual effects and direction of effects. There are many parts (i.e. Groundwater quality, water quality, heritage, etc.) where residual effects are ""negligible"" or ""no measures"" but have been described as potentially negative or postive effects. In addition, within the summary and significant sections for residual effects, there's differences in the directions. The number of impacts also varies depending on where you count, I counted by VEC and using 'determination of sig' rather than 'summarized' number. Within EA however, some lists individual phases while others combine all into one. Worst EA ever...",,9,51,0,9,0,15,9,75,0.12,8,8,0.888888889,0.888888889,1,1,1,1,1,1,not outlined,,Not Given,list of criteria. Seems to require all criteria to be met to be significant,
British Columbia,Southeast BC,-,Line Creek Operations Phase II,15/02/2012,Multiple,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),32,35,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,8,5,4,17,Yes,18.4,31.5,7463,3433,26368,108.984127,17,1,61,1.055555556,581,2145,0.27,3472,0.167,14,106,0,205,106,267,4,4,235,4,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,1.582089552,0.04,0.04,26,135,59,9,0,0.25,1.27,0.56,0.08,229,233,15,0.065502183,Approved,Line Creek Operations Phase II,Cumulative effects not done right here,,3,42,0,4,1,21,4,67,0.059701493,3,3,0.75,0.75,1,0,1,1,1,1,not outlined,,Not Given,list of criteria. Guidelines and professional experience of consultants,
British Columbia,Northeast BC,-,Kerr Sulphurets Mitchell Project,1/7/2013,Multiple,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),41,16,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,9,7,3,12,Yes,23.5,449.8,651.9,3380.8,103688,7.52,51.5,5,308.5,1.16,766,1834,0.42,4437,0.173,132,114,16,130,50,76,2,2,53,3,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,2,0.02,0.03,39,51,10,2,0,0.34,0.45,0.09,0.02,102,37,11,0.108,Approved,KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Project,,,5,39,0,2,0,16,5,57,0.087719298,5,5,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,1,"additive, synergystic, inducive impacts",,Not Given,list of criteria. Seems to require all criteria to be met to be significant,
British Columbia,BC,1231-10537 ,Pacific Northwest LNG project,25/03/2014,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Both,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),16,0,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,3,1,0,3,Yes,2.6,900,16680,2500,16680,2.78,30,4,34,1.133333333,70,259,0.27,1126,0.062,19,70,8,78,42,33,0,0,30,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,4.375,0.6,0,27,119,3,8,0,0.64,2.83,0.07,0.19,157,157,22,0.14,Under Review,PNG LNG,""" In summary, the Project is not likely to result in significant adverse residual environmental effects, including cumulative effects, provided that the proposed mitigation, monitoring and follow-up programs are implemented.""","ThecontributionofGHGemissions from the Project would cause a small material change relative to the total global emissions / In a typical assessment of project effects on the environment, potential effects are assessed by defining discrete criteria for the characterization of residual effects and determiNOT GIVENtion of significance. As per the CaNOT GIVENdian Environmental Assessment Act, 2003, potential effects of GHG emissions on the environment cannot be assessed meaningfully for a single project such as this Project. For this reason, the GHG maNOT GIVENgement assessment focuses on quantifying project emissions and introducing engineering solutions that aim to reduce emissions and make this Project best-in-class.",4,8,0,1,0,7,4,16,0.25,3,3,0.75,0.75,1,1,1,0,0,1,not outlined,,Not Given,list of criteria,
British Columbia,Northeast BC,1231-10408 ,Fortune Creek natural gas-processing facility,22/01/2013,Terrestrial,Oil and Gas,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),14,0,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,1,2,0,2,Yes,0.1,2.3,400,7095,2500,3153.3,25,4,30,1.2,20,106,0.19,740,0.027,18,85,0,85,39,63,0,0,16,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,6.071428571,0,0,3,138,0,1,0,0.04,1.62,0,0.01,142,142,5,0.035,Approved,Fortune Creek Gas Project,,,2,5,0,1,1,8,3,14,0.214285714,0,2,0,0.666666667,0,0,0,0,1,1,not outlined,,Not Given,list of criteria,
British Columbia,Northeast BC,-,Coastal GasLink Pipeline,11/3/2014,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),29,0,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,2,1,2,3,Yes,20.8,1300,3450,98300,355500,75.61538462,30,4,34,1.133333333,234,1368,0.17,2950,0.079,29,185,25,210,147,109,0,0,71,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,6.379310345,0,0,139,740,129,15,0,0.75,4,0.7,0.08,1023,1050,211,0.206256109,Under Review,Coastal GasLink Pipeline Project,,,3,14,0,2,1,13,4,29,0.137931034,2,2,0.5,0.5,1,1,1,0,0,1,not outlined,,Not Given,"list of criteria.  The extent to which the professional judgment of the
12 assessment team was used in the evaluation of significance of potential residual
13 effects is described for each VC. The assessment team consisted of discipline experts,
14 experienced assessment practitioners and senior reviewers",
British Columbia,BC/AB,21799,Enbridge Northern Gateway,27/05/2010,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),52,0,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,18,22,3,13,Yes,21.4,656,656,19680,19680,30,30,4,34,1.133333333,160,2807,0.06,5276,0.03,49,430,30,527,425,505,10,10,186,2,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,8.269230769,0.02,0,189,792,261,39,0,0.44,1.84,0.61,0.09,1281,1114,245,0.191256831,Approved,Enbridge Northern Gateway,,,5,33,0,3,1,16,6,52,0.115384615,5,6,0.833333333,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,not outlined,,Not Given,all determinations are against standards specific to VEC,
Brazil,Cururupu - Maranhão (Northeast Brazil),"DNPM Number: 806.029/2005, 806.001/2006 and 806.002/2006. ",EXPLOTAC?A?O E BENEFICIAMENTO DE SEDIMENTO BIODETRI?TICO MARINHO DA PLATAFORMA CONTINENTAL (CURURUPU-MA) ,12-Jan,Marine,Mining,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),5,10,physical/biological/social,1,0,2,0,No,0.1,29.6,,54,,1.83,51,1.7,52.7,1.03,0,10,0,382,0,4,8,3,11,8,,1,1,,0,reasoned approach,,1.6,1.38,0,1,12,0,0,0,0.13,1.5,0,0,13,13,1,0.077,Approved,Extração Calcário Marinho,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Not Given,,Not Given,list of criteria,
Brazil,Mis Gerais and Rio de Janeiro (Southeast Brazil),,PCH CABUÍ,12-Jan,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),5,22,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,Yes,2,15.4,,54200,,3519.48,40,3,43,1.08,31,66,0.47,953,0.033,12,36,4,40,24,,24,14,11,11,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,7.2,1.11,0.31,5,27,4,11,1,0.14,0.75,0.11,0.31,48,48,11,0.229,Approved,PCH Cabuí,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Additive,,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Mis Gerais e Bahia,,PCH Caiçara,13-Jan,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),6,21,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,Yes,9.9,184.5,15800,16443.5,18300,89.14,200,2.4,202.4,1.01,5,81,0.06,1317,0.004,8,36,11,47,25,,19,12,0,0,reasoned approach,technical,6,1.31,0,27,0,16,1,0,0.75,0,0.44,0.03,44,27,5,0.185,Approved,PCH Caicara,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Additive,,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Mis Gerais e Bahia,,PCH Gavião,13-Jan,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),6,21,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,Yes,10.4,467.2,15750,16443.5,17308,35.2,109,2.4,111.4,1.02,3,85,0.04,1389,0.002,8,37,11,48,26,,20,13,0,0,reasoned approach,technical,6.166666667,1.3,0,27,0,16,1,0,0.73,0,0.43,0.03,44,28,5,0.179,Approved,PCH Gavião,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Additive,,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Espírito Santo,,Atividade Produção e escoamento Petróleo e Gas Bahia de Santos,13-Oct,Marine,Oil and Gas,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),13,17,physical/biological/social,1,1,0,0,No,5000,11000,,311515,,28.32,26,,28,1.08,6,338,0.02,3390,0.002,18,121,8,129,51,,21,11,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,9.307692308,1.07,0,11,20,2,2,3,0.09,0.17,0.02,0.02,38,21,3,0.143,Approved,Atividade Produção e escoamento Petróleo e Gas Bahia de Santos,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Unclear,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Santa Catari,,CONTORNO DE FLORIANO?POLIS ,13-Aug,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),7,16,physical/biological/social,1,0,0,0,Yes,34,37,844,600,2000,16.22,,3,,#DIV/0!,0,66,0,3836,0,20,94,11,105,77,,1,1,0,0,reasoned approach,,13.42857143,0.7,0,35,283,26,5,0,0.37,3.01,0.28,0.05,349,254,13,0.051,Approved,Contorno Rodoviário de Florianópolis,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Unclear,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Porto Alegre,,Linha de transmissão 500 Kv MilagresII- AçuIII,13-Oct,Terrestrial,Energy,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),8,22,physical/biological/social,3,2,0,1,Yes,111,1854.5,9272,18545,128750,10,28.5,1.5,30,1.05,48,173,0.28,2705,0.018,10,42,4,46,38,,1,1,21,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,5.25,0.4,0,60,33,0,11,9,1.43,0.79,0,0.26,113,31,0,0,Approved,Linha de transmissão 500 KV MIRACEMA - SAPEAC?U E SUBESTAC?O?ES ASSOCIADAS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"additive, synergystic",Cumulative impacts are just treated as projects that interact,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil,Mis Gerais,,Mariana- Itabiritos: Ligação Ferroviária - pera de carregamento,13-Jul,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),5,18,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,Yes,0.3,0.7,10.3,1,1416.5,1.52,,1.9,,#DIV/0!,0,62,0,651,0,15,17,2,19,16,,1,1,0,0,reasoned approach,,3.4,1.12,0,13,15,1,3,0,0.76,0.88,0.06,0.18,32,20,2,0.1,Approved,MariaNOT GIVEN- Itabiritos: Ligação Ferroviária-Pera de carregamento,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Not Given,Not Given,Not Given,list of criteria,
Brazil ,"Mis Gerais, Morro do Pilar",,"EIA – Estudo de Impacto Ambiental do Mineroduto Morro do Pilar/MG a Linhares/ES e Porto Norte Capixaba
Pilar/MG a Linhares/ES e Porto Norte Capixaba",1/10/2013,Multiple,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),6,72,physical/biological/social,3,1,1,0,Yes,5,6,127.3,511.8,632606,85.76815432,20,3,23,1.15,0,165,0,8993,0,49,111,19,130,81,0,13,13,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,15.83333333,0.14,0,24,65,0,16,13,0.25,0.68,0,0.17,118,41,1,0.024390244,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Unclear,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Brazil ,"Santa Catari, Itapoá",,"Estudo de Impacto Ambiental - EIA Ampliação da Retroárea e do Píer do Porto Itapoá, Município de Itapoá, Sc",,Multiple,Marine Construction,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),3,24,physical/biological/social,3,2,3,1,Yes,0.4,23.4,257.5,86.2,95346,3.686799555,25,6,31,1.24,0,72,0,2050,0,10,31,9,40,31,0,2,2,0,0,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,11,0.21,0,0,106,0,1,2,0,3.21,0,0.03,109,29,2,0.068965517,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Unclear,Unclear,Not Given,list of criteria,
Veracruz,Vera Cruz State,11-2013_oleoducto_30VE2013X0015,"Manifestacio?n de Impacto Ambiental del oleoducto de 36” Ø Nuevo Teapa – Atitalaquia, comprendido del km 0+000 al 412+806 con sus tres estaciones de bombeo y la adecuacio?n de dos estaciones de bombeo existentes, en el Estado de Veracruz ",2/18/2013,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Mixed (Elements from Effects based and VECs based),7,20,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,No,12.4,206403,,412806,,2,25,2.4,27.4,1.1,3,300,0.01,1144,0.003,21,846,600,1446,19,1,17,6,0,0,reasoned approach,,120.8571429,0.02,0,69,131,2,21,0,0.08,0.15,0,0.02,223,223,3,0.013,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,Veracruz,MIA_30VE2013V0025,"Modernizacion Del Camino Cedro-Quemado-El Suspiro, Con Una Meta De 3.130 Km., En El Estado De Veracruz",29/08/2013,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),9,27,physical/biological/social,2,0,1,0,No,0.2,,351,83.4,,#DIV/0!,25,4,29,1.16,1,18,0.06,160,0.006,14,66,94,160,20,3,6,1,2,2,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,7.333333333,0.09,0.03,81,6,4,8,0,1.23,0.09,0.06,0.12,99,54,2,0.037037037,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,"Veracruz, Municipio de Tuxpan",MIA_30VE2012V0029,La Guadalupana,24/08/2012,Multiple,Marine Construction,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),10,26,physical/biological/social,2,1,2,0,Yes,0.7,0.9,,568.9,,629.3141593,64,13,77,1.203125,2,42,0.05,415,0.005,23,30,11,41,30,5,16,9,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,3,0.53,0,22,22,2,1,0,0.73,0.73,0.07,0.03,47,13,2,0.153846154,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,"Veracruz,Igcio de La Llave",MIA_30VE2012X0028,"Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Regional, para el proyecto de Pemex Exploración y Producción en los sitios Ramsar “Sistema Lagunar de Alvarado” y “Humedales de la Laguna la Popotera”.",7/8/2012,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Both,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),9,36,physical/biological/social,5,1,1,1,No,2043,3087.6,,138.7,,0.044907437,30,19,49,1.633333333,3,95,0.03,926,0.003,124,565,55,620,36,5,10,6,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,62.77777778,0.02,0,74,29,1,3,0,0.13,0.05,0,0.01,107,47,1,0.021276596,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,"Veracruz, Municipio de Jalacingo",MIA_30VE2012FD129,"Cambio de uso de suelo de terrenos forestales, construcción y operación de las
Minicentrales Hidroeléctricas Ocampo-Cuetzalin, en el Municipio de Jalacingo, Estado de Veracruz.",17/10/2012,Multiple,Energy,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),7,18,physical/biological/social,3,1,0,1,No,0,0.2,,9.6,,40.89543973,50,3,53,1.06,3,69,0.04,527,0.006,17,45,9,54,26,1,0,4,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,6.428571429,0,0,8,83,0,1,0,0.18,1.84,0,0.02,92,68,1,0.014705882,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,Veracruz State,MIA_30VE2013E0018,"Dimensionamiento Inicial de un Sistema de Generación eléctrica Sobre el rio Matlacobatl, en el Estado de Veracruz.",17/09/2013,Multiple,Energy,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),7,24,physical/biological/social,4,4,3,0,No,0.1,3,,99.4,,29.72538519,25,1,26,1.04,0,25,0,337,0,12,49,7,56,24,4,7,19,6,6,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,7,0.14,0.12,4,29,1,1,0,0.08,0.59,0.02,0.02,35,35,3,0.085714286,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear ,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,"Veracruz, Xalapa",MIA_30VE2013VD041,"Manifestación De Impacto Ambiental Para La Construcción Del Periférico Sur De Xalapa Tramo 1 Corral Falso- Estanzuela Km 1+300 Al 10+770
Sur De Xalapa Tramo 1 Corral Falso- Estanzuela Km 1+300 Al 10+770

Sur De Xalapa Tramo 1 Corral Falso- Estanzuela Km 1+300 Al 10+770
",23/08/2013,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),8,27,physical/biological/social,2,1,2,0,No,0.5,0.6,,394.8,,694.8609644, ,3,,#VALUE!,0,76,0,238,0,19,114,18,132,30,10,69,32,15,15,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,14.25,0.61,0.13,33,32,11,21,0,0.29,0.28,0.1,0.18,97,30,2,0.066666667,Not Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Veracruz,"Veracruz, Poza Rica de Hidalgo",MIA_30VE2013H0039,"Obra de Captacion, Conduccion y Entrega de Agua del Rio Tecolutla, para el Abastecimiento al Municipio De Poza Rica de Hidalgo, Veracruz",13/11/2013,Multiple,Water magement,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),6,18,physical/biological/social,3,0,0,1,No,0.2,0.2,,7.3,,47.80943947,30,2,32,1.066666667,1,30,0.03,277,0.004,9,32,6,38,18,,0,6,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,5.333333333,0,0,26,20,0,2,0,0.81,0.63,0,0.06,48,48,1,0.020833333,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,Unclear,framework,values are vague that go into framework,
Veracruz,"Veracruz, Boca del Rio y Medellin ",MIA_30VE2013H0020,"Proyecto Ejecutivo De Obras De Abastecimiento De Agua Potable A La Zona Conurbada Veracruz-Boca Del Río-Medellín, Aprovechando Los Escurrimientos Superficiales Del Río Cotaxtla, Presa (Segunda Etapa) En La Localidad De Boca Del Río, Municipio De Boca Del Río, Ver.",16/08/2013,Multiple,Water magement,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),6,17,physical/biological/social,4,1,0,1,No,0.2,0.2,,214.6,,3719.256752,30,2,32,1.066666667,1,12,0.08,292,0.003,8,29,5,34,18,,0,2,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,4.833333333,0,0,25,19,0,2,0,0.86,0.66,0,0.07,46,46,2,0.043478261,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,Unclear,framework,values are vague that go into framework,
Veracruz,"Tabasco, Chiapas y Veracruz",MIA_27TA2012G0032,Sistema de Transporte Etano,20/11/2012,Terrestrial,Oil and Gas,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),8,17,physical/biological/social,3,2,2,0,No,2.3,6.5,,35.6,,5.501917225,30,2,32,1.066666667,3,60,0.05,759,0.004,26,89,35,124,17,1,1,7,1,1,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,11.125,0.01,0.01,2,40,9,0,0,0.02,0.45,0.1,0,51,5,1,0.2,Approved,http://tramites.semarNOT GIVENt.gob.mx/index.php/consulta-tu-tramite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,additive,Unclear,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,"Queensland, Whitsunday",,Drake Coal Project,15-Sep,Terrestrial,Mining,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),16,37,physical/biological/social,0,2,1,0,No,92,176.5,43,60000,1800,339.9433428,26,1.25,30,#VALUE!,5,45,0.11,125,0.04,19,85,15,100,80,1,2,1,0,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,5.3125,0.023529412,0,15,24,3,4,2,0.18,0.28,0.04,0.05,48,14,4,0.285714286,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,framework,values are vague that go into framework - liklihood and consequence,
Queensland,Queensland,,Emu Swamp Dam project,15-May,Multiple,Agriculture,Both,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),11,34,physical/biological/social,4,2,2,1,Yes,1.2,12,430,42000,2300,3500,30,1.6,51.5,1.716666667,5,116,0.04,1472,0.003,27,75,12,87,64,4,6,9,7,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,6.818181818,0.08,0.093333333,30,38,12,2,3,0.4,0.51,0.16,0.03,85,60,20,0.333333333,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,Queensland,,Surat Gas Project,12-Mar,Multiple,Oil and Gas,Both,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),10,22,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,3,2,2,2,Yes,7500,8500,8500,10019,92637,5.085786802,35,35,35,1.590909091,30,137,0.22,722,0.042,15,90,14,104,90,25,3,3,10,6,reasoned approach,technical/reasoned,9,0.37,0.07,13,9,5,1,4,0.14,0.1,0.06,0.01,32,23,6,0.260869565,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,define cumulative impacts as greater than impacts in isolation,framework,values are vague that go into framework - sensitivity and magnitude,
Queensland,Queensland,,Port of Townsville Expansion,15-Mar,Multiple,Transportation,Both,No,No,Yes,No,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),20,27,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,1,1,0,3,Yes,16,86,292,543,305797,6.313953488,30,17,47,1.566666667,65,800,0.08,1300,0.05,25,41,5,46,29,10,0,0,15,5,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,2.3,0.22,0.11,33,30,6,13,4,0.72,0.65,0.13,0.28,86,74,7,0.081395349,Approved,http://www.dsdip.qld.gov.au/assessments-and-approvals/coordiNOT GIVENted-projects-map.html/?marker=Townsville%20Port%20Expansion%20Project,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
Queensland,Queensland,,Galilee Coal Project ,11-Aug,Multiple,Mining,Both,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,5,2,0,1,Yes,27117.74,120000,21837,75000,420000,0.625,25,3,30,#VALUE!,30,2800,0.01,3400,0.009,27,67,12,79,56,0,0,0,7,4,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0,0.06,43,28,8,4,0,0.64,0.42,0.12,0.06,83,62,12,0.144578313,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,have scales of certainty,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
Queensland,Queensland,,Gladstone Steel Plant Project,12-Jul,Multiple,Manufacturing,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,4,2,0,2,Yes,8500,13440,34854,66743,276700,4.965997024,,4, ,#VALUE!,20,416,0.05,571,0.035,15,43,9,52,34,4,1,1,18,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0.02,0,35,12,2,1,0,0.81,0.28,0.05,0.02,50,32,8,0.16,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,outline which activities lead to potential cumulative impacts with associated stressors,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,Queensland,,Gold Coast International Marine Precinct ,12-Aug,Marine,Transportation,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,3,0,1,0,Yes,0.5,2.5,4,40,305,16,,3,,#DIV/0!,22,337,0.07,598,0.037,8,32,4,36,28,0,2,2,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0.06,0,18,13,4,0,0,0.56,0.41,0.13,0,35,35,3,0.085714286,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,used multi-criteria analysis to understand cumulaitve impact in relation to which scenario was the best,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,Queensland,,GOLD COAST QUARRY,13-Apr,Terrestrial,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social,2,3,2,2,Yes,2167,3208,4125,12635,120653,3.938591022,40,4,44,1.1,2,350,0.01,840,0.002,24,17,5,22,8,0,0,0,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0,0,12,6,3,3,0,0.71,0.35,0.18,0.18,24,12,3,0.125,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,Queensland,,Kevin?s Corner Project,12-Sep,Terrestrial,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social,8,6,3,1,Yes,70,2125,2125,73335,135000,34.51058824,30,4,34,1.1,67,1670,0.04,2740,0.024,19,89,16,95,76,4,2,2,29,2,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0.02,0.02,62,65,19,8,6,0.7,0.73,0.21,0.09,120,80,16,0.133333333,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,"high severity environmental impacts are those that will have a ""significant impact"" on environment"
Queensland,Queensland,,The Range Project,13-Apr,Terrestrial,Mining,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),15,45,physical/biological/social,2,1,3,2,Yes,34.2,70,,,,0,26,2,28,1.076923077,,,#DIV/0!,,#DIV/0!,35,67,12,79,56,6,3,3,21,3,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,4.47,0.04,0.04,,,,,,0,0,0,0,,,,#DIV/0!,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
Queensland,Queensland,,Newlands Coal Project,12-Apr,Terrestrial,Mining,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social,1,0,0,0,Yes,31.8,116.7,341,1473,3817,12.61778311,25,1,31,0,9,275,,411,0.022,36,111,11,122,111,2,22,22,10,3,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0.2,0.03,27,39,15,2,3,0.24,0.35,0.14,0.02,86,45,11,0.127906977,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
California,Central Costal California,CSLC EIR NO. 758,Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project,12-Jul,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),15,99,physical/biological/social,5,3,2,5,,1985,1985,8543.6,3910,,1.9697733,0.224,0,0.224,1,26,244,0.11,701,0.037,21,63,0,63,63,18,10,10,8,8,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,4.2,0.16,0.13,27,24,2,0,5,0.43,0.38,0.03,0,58,58,18,0.310344828,Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/division_pages/DEPM/Reports/CCCSIP/CCCSIP.html,MADE BY GUILLAUME,"Very important: ""The discussion of these issues differs from the other “impact” analyses presented in this Environmental Impact Report (EIR), in that the State California Environmental Quality 7 Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15131 states that economic and social effects of a 8 project are not significant environmental effects; however, they may be used to 9 determine the significance of physical changes caused by a project."" EA, p. 7-1",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"additive, countervailing, synergistic","countervailing is antagonistic, also discusses impacts as stressors that contribute to impact",Not Given,no clear list,
California,"San Francisco Bay, CA",CSLC EIR No. 744,SHORE MARINE OIL TERMINAL LEASE PROJECT,1-Jan,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),15,58,physical/biological/social,3,3,1,4,,0,627,1854.3,1953,,3.114832536,30,0,30,1,32,115,0.28,444,0.072,7,11,1,12,11,4,6,6,8,6,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,0.73,0.55,0.55,3,8,2,2,0,0.27,0.73,0.18,0.18,15,15,3,0.2,Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/Division_Pages/DEPM/Reports/NuStar/NuStar.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,Not Given,values that go into framework are vague,
California,"San Francisco Bay, CA",,Shell Martinez Marine Terminal Lease Consideration,11-May,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),14,78,physical/biological/social,3,2,1,3,,0.1,1082,15,1082.4,,1.000369686,30,0,30,1,62,169,0.37,523,0.119,13,62,0,62,62,25,16,16,19,12,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,4.43,0.26,0.19,4,14,4,4,0,0.06,0.23,0.06,0.06,26,26,4,0.153846154,Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/Division_Pages/DEPM/Reports/Shell_TermiNOT GIVENl/Shell_TermiNOT GIVENl.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
California,Sacramento Valley,2010092003,ClayPitStateVehicularRecreationarea,12-Jun,Terrestrial,Tourism,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),13,38,physical/biological/social,3,2,3,4,,0.9,,,,,#DIV/0!,20,1,21,1.05,18,114,0.157894737,262,0.06870229,14,47,0,47,47,0,0,0,0,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,3.615384615,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,#DIV/0!,Approved,http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=26300,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
California,Ellwood coast.,2005061013,Revised PRC 421 Recommissioning Project,14-Jan,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),21,68,physical/biological/social,5,2,1,1,,0.3,36.8,5.3,787.6,,21.39635968,20,0.247,20.247,1.01235,25,207,0.12,825,0.03,17,47,1,48,47,17,12,12,5,4,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,2.24,0.26,0.09,15,36,12,4,0,0.32,0.77,0.26,0.09,67,67,25,0.373134328,Not Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/division_pages/DEPM/Reports/Venoco_PRC_421/Venoco_PRC_421.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
California,Kern County,2012091066,Eastern Kern County Acquisition,13-Oct,Terrestrial,Transportation,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,0,0,1,,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),9,0,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,2,4,1,3,Yes,115,,,,,#DIV/0!, ,1,,#VALUE!,11,55,0.2,273,0.04,2,26,0,26,26,1,1,1,1,1,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,2.89,0.04,0.04,2,1,0,0,0,0.08,0.04,0,0,3,3,0,0,Approved,http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=27211,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
California,El Sugundo,2006031091,Chevron El Segundo Marine Terminal Lease Renewal,10-Nov,Marine,Oil and Gas,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),10,0,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,No,,,,,,#DIV/0!,30,0,30,1,28,329,0.09,750,0.037,16,39,2,41,39,14,1,1,4,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,3.9,0.03,0,26,10,1,0,0,0.67,0.26,0.03,0,37,37,5,0.135135135,Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/Division_Pages/DEPM/DEPM_Home_Page.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
California,Pendleton,,Baseside Water Infrastructure,12-Aug,Multiple,Marine Construction,Yes,No,Yes,No,No,No,No,0,,,,,,,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),14,0,physical/biological,0,0,0,0,No,1.5,,,506,,#DIV/0!,,,,#DIV/0!,15,635,0.02,1672,0.009,,,,,,,1,,,,,,0,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,22,5,4,0,0,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,#DIV/0!,31,31,4,0.129032258,Approved,http://www.pendleton.marines.mil/StaffAgencies/EnvironmentalSecurity.aspx,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,Not Given,no clear list,
California,Santa Barbara County,2005061013,San Francisco Bay and Delta Sand Mining Project,14-Jan,Coastal,Oil and Gas,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social,0,0,0,0,No,,,,,,#DIV/0!,20,0,,0,89,356,0.25,825,0.108,26,47,1,48,47,33,14,14,5,4,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#DIV/0!,0.3,0.09,48,23,0,0,0,1.02,0.49,0,0,71,71,3,0.042253521,Approved,http://www.slc.ca.gov/Division_Pages/DEPM/Reports/SF_Sand_Mining/SF_Sand_Mining.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague,
California,"San Francisco, CA", 2007.0030E,8 Washington Street / Seawall Lot 351 Project -,13-Nov,Multiple,Marine Construction,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),2,0,biological,0,0,0,0,,0,0.1,0.1,1.9,1.9,17.03670546,,2.2,,#DIV/0!,34,239,0.14,507,0.067,10,51,0,51,51,,7,7,13,5,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,25.5,0.33,0.1,7,9,0,0,0,0.14,0.18,0,0,16,16,3,1,Approved,http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1828,Megan,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,Waikato region,,Ruakura Private Plan Change Assessment of Environmental Effects ,6/24/2013,Terrestrial,Transportation,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),13,37,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,0,8,1,1,No,3.9,19.9,19.9,1593.8,110,0.478319328,,41,,#DIV/0!,0,80,0,988,0,,51,21,72,72,,0,0,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,3.92,0.75,0.49,4,29,1,1,0,0.08,0.57,0.02,0.02,35,35,6,0.171428571,Approved,,"Wairere had several wives through whom his descendents link with several major Iwi throughout New Zealand. As identified later in this report, a possible mitigation for the development would be for these key ancestors to be commemorated by naming the main streets and roads within the Land Port development after them.",Considered potentially significant impacts not significant because will decrease in importance over time (15 years),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,Central Hawke’s Bay District and the Hastings District ,,RUATANIWHA WATER STORAGE SCHEME ,13-May,Multiple,Energy,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),16,30,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,15,10,10,25,No,4.5,4.5,631,14111,3332,#REF!,35,4.5,,0,0,162,0,925,0,19,73,18,91,83,10,4,4,0,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,4.56,0.05,0,11,84,3,4,1,0.15,1.15,0.04,0.05,103,87,5,0.048543689,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,northern South Island,,White Horse Rock Salmon Farm,1-Oct-11,Marine,Fishing,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),17,26,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,0,0,0,7,Yes,0,0.5,22700,2500,22700,4892.367906,35,,35,1,1,22,0.05,59,0.017,49,50,2,52,50,2,0,0,8,0,reasoned approach,technical/reasoned,2.94,0,0,2,23,0,0,0,0.04,0.46,0,0,25,25,0,0,Partially Approved,http://www.epa.govt.nz/Resource-maNOT GIVENgement/previous/king-salmoNOT GIVENpplications/Pages/AEE%20appendices.aspx ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,,,MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway Project,12-Mar,Multiple,Transportation,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Effects based (VEC focussed),,,physical/biological/social/ecosystem service,0,5,0,12,,1.6,12,731,170,8140,14.13133832,,5,,#DIV/0!,0,286,0,780,0,89,89,7,96,89,,,,1,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0,0,15,123,19,13,3,0.17,1.38,0.21,0.15,173,173,9,0.052023121,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,northern North,,Ara Tuhono - Puhoi to Wellsford Road,26-Aug-13,Multiple,Transportation,Yes,No,No,No,No,No,Yes,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),22,109,physical/biological/social,1,0,2,3,No,0.3,8,27.6,27.6,27.6,3.476112648, ,5,,#VALUE!,0,1203,0,1535,0,2,49,17,65,49,4,4,13,6,2,technical/collaborative/reasoned,technical/collaborative/reasoned,2.23,0.27,0.04,6,34,4,1,0,0.12,0.69,0.08,0.02,45,45,45,1,Approved,http://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/puhoi-wellsford/index.html,"No specific mitigations are in the mitigation section - rather there are ""potential conditions"" for mitigation plans to meet",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,southern North,,Basin Bridge,13-Jun-13,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,Stressor based (not VEC focussed),21,125,physical/biological/social,0,0,2,1,No,0,0.1,6.4,0.2,27.6,1.673987673,100,2.3,,0,0,1145,0,1532,0,2,44,20,64,44,2,2,9,2,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,2.1,0.2,0,2,36,3,3,0,0.05,0.82,0.07,0.07,44,44,8,0.181818182,Not Approved,http://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/basin-bridge-application/index.html,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
New Zealand,Canterbury,,Christchurch Southern Motorway Stage 2,12-Nov,Terrestrial,Transportation,Yes,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,Mixed (Elements from Effects based and VECs based),,,,0,0,0,2,,0.9,,,,,#DIV/0!,,4,,#DIV/0!,1,212,0,623,0.002,13,55,19,74,55,3,0,0,1,0,reasoned approach,reasoned approach,#DIV/0!,0,0,9,56,6,2,0,0.16,1.02,0.11,0.04,73,73,25,0.342465753,Approved,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not given,,Not Given,no clear list,
England and Wales,Norfolk,,"The Proposed Palm Paper CCGT 3 Order King’s Lynn, Norfolk",19/08/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0,314.2, ,1513, ,4.816170619,40,1.5,41.5,1.0375,20,105,0.19,393,0.051,24,34,2,36,22,0,1,1,4,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#REF!,0,0,0,35,3,0,0,0,1.03,0.09,0,38,21,0,0,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values that go into framework are vague (sensitivity and magnitude),
England and Wales,Yorkshire,,Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline,7/1/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Mixed approach,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0,750.1,,472.3, ,0.629639604,40,2,42,1.05,41,766,0.05,2422,0.017,18,533,2,535,533,338,33,33,15,0,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,#REF!,0.06,0,55,233,38,0,0,0.1,0.44,0.07,0,326,326,26,0.079754601,Under Review,,,Decommissioning subject to a different EIA ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,"consider ""interactive effects"", or impacts that interact from single project",framework,values that go into framework vague,
England and Wales,Yorkshire,,Dogger Bank Teesside A & B,1/3/2014,Multiple,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,area measurements for the whole assessment,11.2,1164,1164,22274,22274,19.13573883,30,6,31,1.033333333,613,703,0.87,3567,0.172,20,384,12,396,396,245,12,12,154,6,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#REF!,0.05,0.02,0,325,19,1,0,0,0.85,0.05,0,345,345,10,0.028985507,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,actual consideration of data confidence,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,Suffolk,,Progress Power Station,4/1/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,Mixed approach,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0.1,706.9,,706.9, ,1,25,1.75,26.75,1.07,12,327,0.04,961,0.012,9,274,16,290,274,112,15,15,43,4,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,#REF!,0.05,0.01,0,158,8,0,0,0,0.58,0.03,0,146,146,1,0.006849315,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,Yorkshire,,Ferrybridge Multifuel 2,1/7/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,Mixed approach,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0.1,314.2, ,78.5, ,0.250007958,50,3,54,1.08,10,90,0.11,574,0.017,54,110,6,116,110,42,2,2,10,5,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#REF!,0.05,0.05,0,21,4,0,0,0,0.19,0.04,0,25,22,2,0.08,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,South Wales,,The Port Talbot Steelworks (Power Generation Enhancement) ,1/7/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0.2,706.9,,706.9, ,1,35,3,38,1.085714286,38,142,0.27,784,0.048,45,143,18,161,143,72,3,3,13,0,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#REF!,0.06,0,2,144,8,3,0,0.01,1.01,0.06,0.02,157,157,19,0.121019108,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,intra and interproject effects,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,East Midlands,,East Midlands Gateway Strategic Rail Freight Interchange,1/7/2014,Terrestrial,Transportation,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,1,2,2,0,areas for different VECs,0.6,279.3,,15630, ,55.9613319,,7,,#DIV/0!,24,167,0.14,589,0.041,21,238,23,261,238,68,2,2,80,5,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,#REF!,0.05,0.02,17,141,5,18,0,0.07,0.59,0.02,0.08,188,188,9,0.04787234,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,Wales,,Mynydd y Gwynt Wind Farm,1/7/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,No,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0.3,314.6,,5179, ,16.46217419,25,1,26,1.04,61,145,0.42,515,0.118,18,68,4,72,68,22,7,7,17,11,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,#REF!,0.12,0.16,10,54,1,0,0,0.15,0.79,0.01,0,75,75,5,0.066666667,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,,framework,values in framework vague,
England and Wales,Dorset and Hampshire County,,Navitus Bay Wind Park,1/4/2014,Multiple,Energy,Both,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,0.4,22739.5,,6422, ,0.28241606,25,5,32,1.28,141,582,0.24,2436,0.058,15,932,11,943,932,421,26,26,133,0,technical/reasoned,reasoned approach,#REF!,0.03,0,6,212,19,16,0,0.01,0.23,0.02,0.02,355,355,8,0.022535211,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,"interrelationships, use a source-pathway-receptor model to determine impacts",framework,"values in framework vague, also professional judgement can overrule framework",
England and Wales,South West England,,Hinkley Point C Connection,9/5/2014,Terrestrial,Energy,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,No,No,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,Effects based,,,,0,0,0,0,areas for different VECs,1.5,1454.2,1454.2,240.6,240.6,0.165435715,40,5,45,1.125,279,881,0.32,3440,0.081,27,453,35,488,453,245,0,0,95,6,technical/reasoned,technical/reasoned,#REF!,0.12,0.01,5,318,107,8,0,0.01,0.7,0.24,0.02,431,431,9,0.020881671,Under Review,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not outlined,intra and interproject effects,no framework,list of criteria,