This manuscript has been rejected as unsuitable for publication. Rejection Note The manuscript has passed preliminary checks. Editor's Decision REJECT Unfortunately this submission does not meet the minimum standards necessary to send it out to reviewers. In order for a paper to be reviewable, it is first necessary that it show some awareness of the field and connects the research reported to existing work. (In fact, the initial claim made by the paper, that existing systems do not allow new terms to be created, is false.) Awareness of vector-based models of concepts (or even description logics) would be a starting point. It would additionally be necessary to have some understanding of psycholinguistics (to the extent that this is supposed to be a psychologically plausible model) and computational linguistics. I would recommend starting with Jurafsky and Martin's book `Speech and language processing'. Secondly, the paper needs to meet minimum standards of coherence in argumentation. In particular, the main claim for novelty here is the relevance of personality types, but this is stipulated with no justification. Thirdly, there needs to be some way of evaluating the claim made by the paper - either experimentation, or a justification based on known data and a formal model (compared to existing models). This is absent.